|
This was our last week working with the Young Artists at City Arts. As such we needed to go through all the photos they had taken over the course of the class to select which would be in the exhibition. This was quite a process as the Young Artists had taken many photos over the past weeks. Narrowing it down was a challenge. As the Young Artist came flooding in the classroom, what I can only describe as a flash of neon orange ran over and took the stool next to me. Ben has always been one our most active but challenging Artists to teach. He constantly wants to be entertained and receiving attention. If something doesn’t interest him than he will simply move on to something else. But he is also very creative and has a great sense of humor and energy that brightens the room. As he sat next to me we connected over the rubrics cube he had brought with him. He was very excited to tell me all about it and the bag of Cheetos in his coat pocket which he grabbed on his way in. We asked the Young Artists to choose just five photos that represented themselves and their communities. This concept seemed a little puzzling for some of the Young Artists while coming more easily to others. Ben’s attention was harder to hold on to once we started looking at the photos on the computer. It was hard to get him to focus on the criteria for choosing the photos. He had very strong opinions about which photos he wanted in the exhibition, almost every picture he chose was one of himself. I found the best technique was to give him little breaks, letting him put his attention on something else then bringing it back to look at more photos. However I did noticed he was very enthusiastic and proud to show his photos to the whole classroom, or whoever’s attention he could get. For our closing activity we went around and asked the Young Artists to share what they had titled their top photograph. This was both amusing and insightful, as it showed us how the Young Artists were viewing their own photos. Some of the titles were more thoughtful while others tended to be more descriptive of the content of the photo. The teaching portion of our work at City Arts may be complete, but there is still a lot of decisions and “narrowing down” to do before the exhibition date. AuthorKate Day, Providence College Class of 2019, Photography Major
0 Comments
Far too often do we begin our photographic pursuits lost in the envy of another's photos. Instead of honing our technique and execution, we focus on the stuff we don't have. Stuff... that's all it is... just stuff. Whether it be the lens to get that creamy smooth bokeh in the background, the full-frameMPs necessary for crisp resolution, or the flash necessary to light a picture, we all do it and its ruining our imagination. This is why I think kids can reinvigorate our sense of imagination and fun. In the past few weeks CityArts has become a think-tank for the young artists and their corresponding PC pals. Often we see students thoughtfully look at their pictures and stop just long enough to revel in the joy and the smiles of their subjects, or perhaps notice something we were too blind to see, while our eye involuntarily scavenge the small screens for perfect composition and symmetry. In one case an energetic student ran up to each Providence student lauding the composition in his photo. He drew our attention to the face engrained in the architecture along the side of the building, which comprised of two window eyes and a door for a mouth. Clearly it was more exciting for him just to find than to beautifully portray, and even more enthralling to him that we didn't find it before him and I'm glad that he did; because, in more ways than one, his discovery marks the great hallmark of true photographic skill, this ability to point out the beauty in front of someone. It's a scavenger hunt of course. But it's not about quantity of quality photographs. Rather, it's about inspiring and that's why we're so hell-bent on approval (perhaps even if we do not say this outright). So how do we then enhance ours and the students' experience by working with what we have? Well, this past week we did so by teaching the students how to use natural light to illuminate our subjects. As the semester goes on we have more and more light during our time at CityArts. More light also means more energetic kids looking for any semblance of an excuse to get outside. When the sun is low-enough on the horizon we call this, "golden hour," photography, which gets its origins from the warm golden hues that heavily illuminate subjects of interest. A few young artists managed to catch PC students taking advantage of this time period and out of interest walked over to see. As we encouraged them to advantage themselves this very short window of opportunity, many were very elated with the change in their photographic composition. One PC student peaked over their shoulders and saw the photo on their tiny canon point-and-shoots, and let slip out a, "oh sh**" they take better photos then I do, and I've been at this for a while." Inevitably, in that moment, my partner and I realized: you combine the innovation and imagination of a young child (perhaps our own "inner kid") with the resourcefulness of a seasoned photographer and you have a potent mix. All that other stuff falls by the wayside... Blog AuthorDanny Hentz, Providence College Class of 2017, Global Studies Major, Evolutionary Biology & Ecology Minor Friday was probably the most beautiful day of the new year weather-wise which was great at a certain level, incredibly worrying at another. Great because we could take photos outside with the young artists providing the opportunity to experiment with lighting and angles in their shots; on the other hand, it is not supposed to be near 65°F near the end of February and some of the young artists would rather play outside than take photos. I don’t really blame them either, it’s what I would have wanted to do too especially when on break from school. I think these two factors played into the semi-rambunctious atmosphere the class had and why we had less young artists participate than other weeks. The week’s lesson was focused around portraiture: how to identify portraits and what needs to be in a portrait for it to be considered one. I felt that the activity we did to get this idea across was, on the whole, successful. Throughout the room, we put up portraits and non-portraits like landscapes having the young artists identify their favorite one, describe why it was a portrait and why it was their favorite. After that we moved on to our portrait-taking activity – those of themselves, their buddy that they were paired with, of one of us PC students, group portraits – outside to represent those persons’ personalities. There were some great photos taken, however I think we also did lose some of their attention because the young artists wanted to play on a nearby playground incredibly badly. Reflecting on this, I think striking that balance between giving the artists their freedom and also accomplishing our goals for the exhibition is still something we are working on; it’s a great sign that they feel comfortable enough to joke, talk, and play with us, those relationships are incredibly important. Yet, I believe they can also sense when we are hesitant to restrict them to doing what we must. Then, the artists can lose focus and run over us. Despite this, each of the young artists took some great portraits and were able to articulate how it represented the person in the photo as well as what artistic elements of the photo they enjoyed most. The experiences I have had so far while serving at ¡CityArts! make me reminisce aboutthe days when I was a student just like them in one of these classes as well as the times when I taught small, informal drawing classes for younger kids when I was in the later years of high school. I think that old experience is coming back to me, especially after this week in terms of what to do and not to do in these classes with younger people. I saw the young artist I was working with fluctuating between interest and disinterest in taking photos during the day; he wanted to play basketball. So, I incentivized his taking of photos: for every three shots he took, he would have to take three portraits which worked out for a good portion of the time. Sometimes this type of persuasion can be an incredibly effective quid pro quo. Maybe this is a way to find balance without having to turn to heavy handedness. Unfortunately, when we had to return to the classroom to discuss the photos, he became downtrodden because he still wanted to play and didn’t want to participate in our group debrief. I sat with him, tried to coax him to share, but I’ve learned that sometimes pushing can do more harm than good especially when someone is upset. So, I then decided to sit next to him for the remainder of the time. It reminded me of how difficult it was to teach youth and maintain their engagement in the learning. Still shaking off the rust, but really excited about the next few weeks. See this week's lesson plan below! 
Blog AuthorStephen Skelly, Providence College Class of 2017, Sociology & Global Studies Double Major. |
Blog CuratorsPublic & Digital Relations - Dee, Gretchen, Danny & Stephen ArchivesCategories
All
|
||
RSS Feed